Yes, I’m still here.
When he goes off, either on a trip or on a set of blogposts (and sometimes both at the same time, cf. Seeing Scores), I prefer to leave him to it. A librarian without a library (or in the case when he was in Dayton at that Bergamo Curriculum Theorizing conference, while Zooming in to the Disability Studies and Art Education (DSAE) conference – a librarian with a mobile library).
Like the library ghost I am, I have been crouched here on his shelves all the time; slipping through the books, thinking which one I can turn him and his typing (dancing?) fingers towards (cf. Pelenakeke Brown‘s presentation at DSAE called A Traveling Practice project)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84b4c/84b4c9460249b97ad1cc35b18bce6b18e81a7256" alt=""
I may be the ghost here, but he is the one who betrays a sluggish thingliness and so I like to use this dynamic space of this here blog – this daily set of words, images, sounds, videos – to nudge him towards a more kinetic activity. And no I am not in cahoots with Nazi Heidegger’s spirit, in case you were wondering, more with The Friendliest Black Artist in America, Pope. L and his attention to a language of illegibility (cf. Rosette Cirillo‘s presentation at Bergamo on necromancy, the problem of making the dead legible, and Kanye’s hologram for Kim)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c325/5c325bdbc93e83792d144bf5d7919d302adcf4fe" alt=""
I’m making him do his typing dance barely legible writing thing (it is ok if you have trouble understanding him, too) here from the pages of Proto-Skin Set: Pope. L (New York: Mitchell-Innes & Nash, 2017). You have probably encountered one or two of Pope. L’s Skin Set series in a gallery or museum near you (here in Columbus, OH, they were included in two exhibitions at the Wex – Blues for Smoke and, most recently, Climate Changing; and there was a splattering of them, among the whispers, at documenta 14 in Kassel).
In the Proto-Skin Set book, Pope. L describes the Skin Set sequence in relation to what he calls his own illegibility as follows:
I believe blackness – for example, racializing as a kind of ‘as if’ marking on a thing or surface – produces an over-writing, a palimpsest of meanings, that may obscure or delete or redefine who or what a person is as a person. I have tried to problematize this state of affairs via several strategies. Here are a few: making things difficult in which case I make something more complex or harder than common sense says it should be; or autobiography and inappropriate sharing to create a person-to-person connection; or contradiction where I insist, for example, that illegibility has its own value or humor used as a lubricant to loosen up, make wobbly or even instrumentalize legibility for my own uses.
Turning to the Proto-Skin Sets from the Skin Sets (proper), Pope. L returns to the thing and illegibility in the form of troubling understanding:
Protos relate to SS [Skin Sets] proper in that they share interest in language, handwriting, foregrounding or bringing into parity the conceptual with object-making – how to teach a thing to speak…. Protos are understood, at one time, as one thing with no sense of system except the desire for a system – whereas SS proper is produced within a system of relations and duration. This system is also a system of understanding because I am always attempting to better understand what I am doing and at the same time trouble that understanding and push the limits of what constitutes a Skin Set thing – at the same time I am always operating within the limits of my life and time…