How does a society commemorate a war for which the central narrative is one of division and dissent, a war whose history is highly contested and still in the process of being made? 2008: Jane Hammond’s Fallen

The day after Memorial Day, twelve years ago tomorrow in 2008, the then Wexner Center educator Amanda Potter (now Curator of Education and Interpretation at the Zimmerli Art Museum) delivered a talk on Jane Hammond’s gallery B installation Fallen.

At the talk, Potter spoke of how Hammond’s nationally touring installation featuring a large field of colorful, handmade leaves—each inscribed with the name of a U.S. soldier killed in Iraq, fits within the context of traditions of artists responding to war and violence. She also discussed how Fallen functioned as an anti-monument, visualizing loss but with a conflicted relationship to authorized memorialization. This talk laid the groundwork for an article that Potter published in collaboration with the artist called ‘Collecting Leaves, Assembling Memory: Jane Hammond’s Fallen and the Function of War Memorials’ Archives of American Art Journal Vol. 47, No. 3/4 (2008), pp. 66-77.

I post screengrabs of Potter’s article today as a minor anti-monument to the now over 100,000 deaths from COVID-19 in the US.

At the same time as the current US president wages a failing war on the invisible enemy of COVID-19, he describes these deaths as a “badge of honor” for his (false) claims of extensive testing.

In this context, we may ask, is the cover of last Sunday’s The New York Times, also an anti-monument to the Trump administration’s failure to adequately respond to the pandemic?

In any case, like Hammond’s Fallen, it visualizes and names a terrible and inconsolable loss.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.